Health-related quality of life of patients submitted to correction of heart valve diseases
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The measurement of the health-related quality of life construct can reveal the positive repercussions on the lives of patients undergoing corrective valve procedures, as well as revealing points that prevent new surgical approaches. Objective: To identify the health-related quality of life of valvular heart disease in the perioperative period of conventional valve surgery. Methods: This is an integrative literature review. Searches were performed independently in four databases using controlled and uncontrolled descriptors. Eligibility criteria were: original articles that addressed the assessment of the health-related quality of life of valvular patients undergoing valve repair and/or valve prosthesis implantation; in Portuguese, English, and Spanish; with a time frame for convenience between 2015 and 2019. Results: 14 studies comprised the final review sample, despite being studies conducted in different countries and with different designs, it was possible to verify the improvement in health-related quality of life when evaluated through generic instruments in valvular patients after valve surgery. However, in studies in which the assessment of the construct occurred through specific instruments, the existence of factors that can interfere with the quality of life of patients undergoing valve implantation was revealed. Conclusion: It was noticed that there was generally an improvement in health-related quality of life after the surgical intervention.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.References
Tarasoutchi F, Montera MW, Ramos AIO, Sampaio RO, Rosa VEE, Accorsi TAD, et al. Atualização das diretrizes brasileira de valvopatias: abordagem das lesões anatomicamente importantes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;109(6 Suppl 2):1-34. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20180007
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Informações epidemiológicas e morbidade DATASUS. Available from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sih/cnv/spauf.def.
Kamenskaya O, Loginova I, Kretov E, Prokhorikhin A, Tarkova A, Lomivorotov VV, et al. Efect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on health-related quality of life in older adults with multimorbidity. Arch Gerontol Geriatrics. 2019;8(1):76-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.10.007
Gomes WJ, Kalil RAK, Jatene FB. Brazilian registry of cardiovascular surgery in adults fully operational. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;31(2):II. http://doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20160040
Kim DH, Kim CA, Placide S, Lipsitz LA, Marcantonio ER. Preoperative frailty assessment and outcomes at 6 months or later in older adults undergoing cardiac surgical procedures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(9):650-60. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0652
Zilli AC, Guizilini S, Rocco IS, Espírito Santo JA, Berwanger O, Kalil RAK, et al. Valve Heart Sugery in Brazil – The BYPASS Registry Analysis. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;35(1):82-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0408
Almeida AS, Picon PD, Wender OCB. Resultados de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de substituição valvar aórtica usando próteses mecânicas ou biológicas. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011;26(3):326-37. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20110006
Leal PM, Amante LN, Girondi JBR, Nascimento ERP, Magalhães ALP. Construindo soluções para segurança do paciente cardiopata em uso de varfarina: estudo qualitativo. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2020;29(esp.):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2018-0002
Caru M, Curnier D, Bousquete M, Kernc L. Evolution of depression during rehabilitation program in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;42(3):378-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1499824
Fleck MPA. A avaliação de qualidade de vida: guia para profissionais da saúde. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2008.
Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberrati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Bio Med Central. 2015;4(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-13
Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM). The Oxford levels of evidence 2. Available from: https://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653
Goldstein D, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns AC, Ailawadi G, Parides MK, Perrault LP et al. Two-year outcomes of surgical treatment of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(4):344-53. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1512913
Ferket BS, Ailawadi G, Gelijns AC, Acker MA, Hohmann SF, Chang HL et al. Cost-effectiveness of mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;11(11):13. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004466
Tsang FHF, Wong SJ, Cheung YF. Pulmonary valve replacement and quality-of-life assessment. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2016;24(1):5-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492315617631
Ren WJ, Zhang BG, Liu JS, Qian YJ, Guo YQ. Outcomes of tricuspid annuloplasty with and without prosthetic rings: a retrospective follow-up study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;10(85). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0281-2
Hong Z, Huang J, Huang L, Cao H, Chen Q. The effect of valve noise on the quality of life of patients after mechanical mitral valve replacement in a Chinese population. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;14(1)137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0956-1
Luksi VR, Dosen D, Pasalic M, Hanzevacki JS. Impact of mild patient prosthesis mismatch on quality of life in patients with preserved ejection fraction after isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2017;227(1):225-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.138
Korteland NM, Ahmed Y, Koolbergen DR, Brouwer M, Heer F, Kluin J, et al. Does the use of a decision aid improve decision making in prosthetic heart valve selection? A multicenter randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(2):e003178. http://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003178
Coelho P, Ferreira LN, Vital C, Fragata J. A cirurgia de substituição valvular aórtica melhora a qualidade de vida dos doentes? Acta Med Port. 2018; 31(7-8):399-408. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.10241
Kidle E, Jarral OA, Harling L, Anderson JR, Chukwuemeka A, Ashrafian H, et al. NR2 antibody is associated with quality of life in aortic valve replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015;23(6):690-700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492315583189
Hansen TB, Zwisler AD, Berg SK, Sibilit KL, Thygesen LG, Kjellberg J, et al. Cost–utility analysis of cardiac rehabilitation after conventional heart valve surgery versus usual care. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(7):698-707. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487317689908
Sibilitz KL, Berg SK, Thygesen LC, Hansen TB, Kober L, Hassager C, et al. High readmission rate after heart valve surgery: A Nationwide cohort study. Int J Cardiol. 2015;189(1):96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.078
Petersen J, Vettorazzi E, Winter L, Schmied W, Kindermann I, Schafers HJ. Physical and mental recovery after conventional aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;152(6):1549-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.072
Kottmaier M, Hettich I, Deutsch MA, Badiu C, Krane M, Lange R, et al. Quality of life and anxiety in younger patients after biological versus mechanical aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65(3):198-205. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584907
Zacek P, Holubec T, Vobornik M, Dominik J, Takkenberg J, Harrer J, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve repair is similar to Ross patients and superior to mechanical valve replacement: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0236-0
Corbi ISA, Dantas RAS, Pelegrino FM, Carvalho ARS. Qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde de pacientes em uso de anticoagulação oral. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2011;19(4):01-09. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692011000400003
Sportelli E, Regesta T, Salsano A, Ghione P, Brega C, Bezante GP, et al. Does patient–prosthesis mismatch after aortic valve replacement affect survival and quality of life in elderly patients? J Cardiovascular Med. 2016;17(2):137-42. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000292